PDF Supplement not Supplant [Read-Only] - West Virginia Department of Education Supplement vs Supplant The term supplement, not supplant is a provision common to many federal statutes authorizing education grant programs. PDF Supplement vs Supplant - Westminster Public Schools PDF CARES Act Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) - Alaska Department of PDF Title I, Part A - marylandpublicschools.org The state Legislature wrote a specific supplement not supplant provision that only applies to the LEA's expenditures for LAP Base Allocation and High Poverty School Allocation. The US Department of Education has . provide services that, taken-as-a-whole, are comparable between Title I and non-Title I schools. Giving Districts Guidance on 'Supplement, Not Supplant' New Supplement Not Supplant Information from U.S. Department of Education Does Not Change Uses of Title I, Part A Funds for Students Experiencing Homelessness. There is no single SNS provision. In no case may Title I funds be used to supplant or take the place of funds from non-federal sources. Unlike Title I, Part A supplanting, the LAP supplement not supplant provision does not consider services funded with general apportionment or federal programs. 2. of Education) and Local Education Agencies). MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT. A significant distinction between the "supplement not supplant" provision in Title III and the The supplement versus supplant issue is not inherent to Title I. OMB Circular A-133 offers general guidance on the application of supplement not supplant provisions. Categorical Programs. PDF Title I, A Fiscal Issues To address this concern, Congress changed the way a school district demonstrates compliance with the Title I supplement not supplant requirement when it reauthorized the ESEA in 2015. PDF Supplement, Not Supplant Handbook - Denton ISD 34 CFR 200.79 - LII / Legal Information Institute cannot use. Title I, Part A Eligibility Dashboard Introductory guide to the Secure Data Portal Access. (ED) issued a Non-Regulatory Information Document entitled, "Supplement Not Supplant Under Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as Amended by the . Memo on New Supplement Not Supplant Information from U.S. Department of supplement, not supplant regular nonFederal funds. Chapter 9 - Supplement vs. Generally, Title I, Part A funds shall be used to supplement, not supplant non-federal funds pursuant to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Section 1114 (a) (3) (B). Supplant verb. twitter facebook pinterest linked in vimeo instagram youtube flickr. Allocation Webinar OSPI updated the dashboard to view Title I, Part A eligibility information for Local Education Agencies (LEAs). Supplement, Not Supplant for Title 1, Part A under ESSA | CDE Documentation that the "Title I look-a-like program" is funded by supplemental local funds, specifically set-aside for this purpose. Contact Information Title I, Part A 360-725-6100 Guidance and support materials related to Title I, Part A fiscal requirements. take the place or move into the position of; Like Share Report 101 Views Download Presentation. Complying with supplement not supplant for Title I schools becomes a funding test, not an expenditure-by-expenditure test. SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS. The use of . Definition of Supplement, Not Supplant The term "supplement, not supplant" is a provision common to many federal statutes authorizing education grant programs. Though the source of funds for both fiscal tests are similar (i.e. Title I Supplement Vs. Supplant Policy.pdf - Google Drive PDF Supplement Not Supplement - Nevada Department of Education Any cost a school district or school would have paid for in the absence of Title I was not considered to be extra and could be considered "supplanting." Provide an effective program to increase English Proficiency and core academic achievement for English learners (EL). Supplement, Not Supplant - New America Supplement, Not Supplant Handbook - Texas Education Agency Guidance to Innovate: What Turnaround Schools Need This general supplement not supplant requirement is largely unchanged from NCLB. 1 Title I, Part A of the ESEA (hereafter "Title I") also includes a similar "supplement not supplant" provision in section 1120A(b). Skip Navigation Rather, the wording of the provision varies depending on the various statutes. Highlights of Supplement, not Supplant Changes: NCLB vs ESSA Under NCLB, supplement not supplant was typically tested by analyzing an individual Title I-A cost's compliance with three presumptions of supplanting: A. The Secretary has indicated that negotiated rule-making for ESSA will include a focus on the supplement and not supplant provisions. An activity required by federal, state, or local law B. Supplement not Supplant Title I, Part A 1 New rules for Title I, Part A Section 1118 (b) (1) Federal funds must be used to supplement and in no case supplant state, and local resources Section 1118 (b) (2) To demonstrate compliance, the LEA shall demonstrate that the methodology used to allocate State and local funds to each school 4 The doctor told Laura to supplement her diet with vitamins. PPTX Title I Supplement Not Supplant - Oklahoma State Department of Education PDF NCLB Toolkit - Chapter 9 - Supplement vs. Supplant District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational Program Services. State and local), Title I Supplement Not Supplant Title I Requirements ESSA Section 1118 (b)(1) The statute requires an LEA to use Title I funds only to supplement the funds that would, in the absence of those Title I funds, be made available from State and localsources for the education of students participating in Title I programs, and not supplant such funds. Title I, Supplement Not Supplant (SNS) - Title I, Part A (CA Dept of To meet the Title I, Part A supplement not supplant requirement, an LEA would use this methodology to allocate State and local funds to each school, without regard to whether each school receives Title I, Part A funds. Updated on Mar 31, 2019. Wallington Public Schools There is Power in Pride. PDF Title III Spending Guidance Understanding Supplement, Not Supplant Although the definition may change from statute to statute, supplement, not supplant provisions basically require that grantees use state or local funds for all services required by state law, State . The press release explains that the rules had become too restrictive and burdensome for school districts thus, creating compliance issues for schools. Welcome to Supplement, not Supplant - Arizona Department of Education Title I of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) contains a provision called the "supplement not supplant" requirement to ensure Title I funds add to, enhance, expand or extend the programs and services offered with state and local funds. Guide to Using Small, Rural School Achievement (SRSA) and Rural and Low Supplement, Not Supplant - Wyoming Department of Education The bottom line: While the document is supposedly a guideline, the language in ESSA is more of a mandate.Where will we most likely see 'supplements' in education? The program(s) may make use of both English and the student's native language. ESSA Required Docs / Highly Qualified Letter to Parents Supplement, as a noun, means something added. Supplanting under Title I-C means that recipients . The Ohio Department of Education. PDF The Answer to Title I Supplement Not Supplant 2017 Conference Supplement Not Supplant Demonstration Under Title I Part PDF SUPPLEMENT N SUPPLANT - Texas Education Agency Statement on Supplement vs Supplant; Title I Program Plan; Title I/Title III Compact; If you are having trouble viewing the document, you may download the document. Let's start with the definitions. one-time funds through the foundation formula versus the allocation based on the Title I-A funding formula for the ESSERF. PDF Guidance Supplement Not Supplant - New York State Education Department Because Sec. Supplant verb. Supplement, not supplant is an integral provision of most federal statutes that authorize education grant programs. Supplement, as a verb, means to add something or make up for a deficiency. Title I has slightly different supplement-not-supplant requirements, but for the purposes of Title II-A, Title III, and Title IV-A, it is presumed that supplanting has occurred if: An LEA used federal funds to provide services that the LEA was required to make available under other Federal, State or local laws. Supplement - Not Supplant requires LEAs to distribute State and local funds to schools without taking in to account a school's participation in the Title I program. SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT. "Supplement, Not Supplant" procedures describe how the district ensures that Title I funds are used only to supplement, and not supplant, state and local funds that would, in the absence of Title I funds, be spent on Title I students. Document Library - ccip.ode.state.oh.us Supplement vs. the office of management and budget (omb) circular a-133 compliance supplement presumes supplanting in the following situations: aefla funds used to provide services that the aefla provider is required to make available under other state mandate or local board policy, or aefla funds used to provide services that were provided with fiscal support Rather, the wording of the provision varies depending on the statute that contains it. PDF NYSED Guidance: Title I, Part A Supplement Not Supplant PDF A Discussion of Supplement vs. Supplant - nj.gov (ESEA section 1118(b)(3)) Exclusion of Funds The requirement that ESSA funds supplement and not supplant state and local funds is intended to ensure that federal resources are used to provide additional educational . While this supplement vs. supplant rule is critical to ensuring states don't shortchange schools on much-needed state dollars, it is also considered by local . DeVos has recently completed a new non-regulatory 'Supplement, not Supplant' guidebook for SEAs and LEAs (State Education Agencies, usually your State Dept. State or local funds may not be decreased or diverted for other uses merely because of the availability of these funds. PDF Supplement Not Supplant Provison of Title III of the ESEA - Tennessee Augment vs Supplement - Writing Tips Where Title I funding is allowable for schoolwide programs, districts must use federal funds to supplement the amount that would be made available by non-federal funds, especially including legally required funding to support students with disabilities and English language learners. Supplement vs. Supplant Guidance - Arizona Department of Education PPT - SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT PowerPoint Presentation, free download Supplant. PDF Frequently Asked Questions Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Supplement, Not Supplant Policy and Procedures - Massachusetts In order to be in compliance with each program's version PDF New Jersey Department of Education - Government of New Jersey Supplement vs Supplant - What's the difference? | WikiDiff providing local educational agencies (LEAs) that receive funds under part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), including charter schools that are LEAs, with emergency relief funds to address the impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had, and continues to have, on elementary and secondary schools across the Nation. This handbook discusses supplement, not supplant in general and as it applies to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as reauthorized by the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA). Title III is for: Title III is not for: Language Instruction . This process assessed whether a particular Title I cost was supplemental and focused on the use of the Title I funds. About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features Press Copyright Contact us Creators . Supplement, Not Supplant - Title I-A ONLY Section 1118 (b)(3) Special Rule states that no LEA shall be required to: Identify that an individual cost or service supported is supplemental or Provide services through a particular instructional method or setting to demonstrate compliance 48. SUPPLEMENT vs. Supplement vs. Under the old cost-by-cost analysis, a school would have to demonstrate that each of its expenditures charged to Title I would not have been otherwise funded by state and local dollars. 6825] SUBGRANTS TO ELIGIBLE ENTITIES. 3. District and school personnel must maintain documentation that . To overthrow, undermine, or force away, in order to get a substitute in place of. SUPPLANT: Title I funds must be used to supplement (increase the level of services) and not supplant (replace) funds from nonfederal sources. "Supplement" means to "build upon" or "add to"; "supplant" means to "replace" or "take the place of.". The provision of federal and state funded programs provides that only supplemental costs may be charged. . Supplementing versus supplanting grant funds - Seliger Identify that an individual cost or service supported with Title I funds is supplemental; or Provide Title I services through a particular instructional method or in a particular instructional setting in order to demonstrate compliance. PPT - Supplement vs. Supplant PowerPoint Presentation, free download FutureEd Research Director Reagan Miller explained the issues in this post from last summer: Rather, this practice would be governed by the statutory supplement not supplant requirement in section 1120A(b) of Title I. Use of federal funds to support More than a year later than promised, The U.S. Education Department just released its guidance for how school districts should implement the federal requirement that Title I money be used to supplement not supplant state and local funds. Sign in Supplement vs. As a noun supplement is something added, especially to make up for a deficiency. PDF SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT UNDER TITLE I, PART A OF THE ELEMENTARY - ed Supplement Not Supplant Title I Requirements ESSA Section 1118(b)(1) The statute requires an SEA or LEA to use Title I funds only to supplement the funds that would, in the absence of those Title I funds, be made available from State and local sourcesfor the education of students participating in Title I programs, and not to supplant such funds. Compliance Issues for Categorical Programs. Defining "Supplant" and "Supplement". Slideshow 528527 by kapila Some RFPs make this explicit; for example, the HUD NOFA for the Capital Fund Recovery Competition Grants says on page 26: No Supplanting of Funds. provided that each Title I school received its "fair share" based on the district's funding methodology, items supported by Title I in a targeted or school-wide program are deemed to be supplemental. Supplant . RLIS funds may be used for any allowable activities under Title I, Part A, Title II, Part A, Title III, and Title IV, Part A, as well as parental involvement activities. Title III Part A SEC. Both SRSA and RLIS funds must be used to supplement, and not supplant, any other Federal, State, or local education funds. Existing funds for a . WIOA Supplement Not Supplant FAQ's - Governance & Accountability (CA Supplement and Not Supplant Rule-Making | CDE - Colorado Department of Supplant Supplement - the use of funds to pay for services that are in addition to those already provided by other funding sources Supplant - the use of funds to pay for services that are provided by other funding sources o. The new guidance sets out examples and a series of FAQs to . PDF Supplement Not Supplant: Title I, Part A and LAP - k12.wa.us If a district gives one site/school funds, is the district required to allocate the same percentage to . The "supplement not supplant" provision in Title I prohibits the supplanting of non-Federal funds. SUPPLANT: Title I funds must be used to supplement (increase the level of services) and not supplant (replace) funds from nonfederal sources. Title I, Part A, nust NOT replace, State Funds and Local Funds. What Does New Federal "Supplement, not Supplant" Guidance Mean for Supplement, Not Supplant Controversy Under ESSA Grant Writing: Thou Shalt Not Supplant - eCivis No. Supplement, not supplant, restrictions do not apply to GEERF or ESSERF. Federal law requires that all federal funds be used to SUPPLEMENT the regular educational initiative and programs of the local school district. DeVos' New 'Supplement, Not Supplant' Guidebook Is Supplanting & Is Not Title I, Part A Spending Snapshot | Department of Education The term supplement, not supplant is a provision common to many federal statutes authorizing education grant programs. Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), the supplement, not supplant (SNS) requirement was met by ensuring individual Title I costs did not fall within the presumptions of supplanting test. Supplanting Versus Supplementing: A Key Distinction. Supplement Not Supplant Guidance Final Supplement Not Supplant Non-Regulatory Guidance, June 2019 2016 Non-Regulatory Guidance - Fiscal Issues Federal Guidelines Methodologies Exclusion of Supplemental Non-Federal Funds Intent and Purposes A-9: There is not a regulation or guidance that per se prohibits the use of Title I funds to pay for credits that lead to high school graduation. Key Words: Supplement, supplant Summary: Definition of supplant; federal programs that have the no supplant requirement, explanations for Title I Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance, and Limited English Proficient (LEP) programs Definition Under the Federal "supplement not supplant" requirement, the Ohio Department of Education Today, the U.S. Department of Education (Department) announced final rules that will better protect veterans and service members from predatory recruitment practices, implement access to Pell Grants for incarcerated students in high-quality prison education programs, and increase accountability when colleges and universities change ownership. supplement, and not supplant, the funds that would be made available from State and local sources in the absence of such Federal funds. There is no single supplement, not supplant provision. Title I Supplement Vs. Supplant. On June 20, 2019, the U.S. Department of Education released new guidance for SEAs and LEAs on Supplement, Not Supplant. The new guidance explains how ESSA has changed the requirements. State or local funds may not be decreased or diverted for other uses merely because of the availability of these funds. Title III: Supplement vs. Supplant Title III: Supplement vs. (a) For the purpose of determining compliance with the supplement not supplant requirement in section 1118(b) and the comparability requirement in section 1118(c) of the ESEA, a grantee or subgrantee under this subpart may exclude supplemental State and local funds spent in any school attendance area or school for programs that meet the intent and purposes of title I of the ESEA. New Education Department guidance on supplement-not-supplant: Sorry not Florida Offers Lessons on Supplement Not Supplant - ExcelinEd Fiscal Requirements and Guidance | OSPI - k12.wa.us Federal law prohibits recipients of federal funds from replacing state, local, or agency funds with federal funds. Supplement vs. A vitamin, herbal extract or chemical compound ingested to meet dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development. Some people augment their income with Internet businesses. 3115. Supplant . In the education world, SNS represents the "supplement-not-supplant" provision of Title Ithe section of the federal education law that specifies that federal Title I funds for schools with . Title I, Part A Spending Snapshot | Department of Education - Maine U.S. Department of Education What is the Title III Supplement, Not Supplant Requirement? October 20, 2021 admin Confusing Words Augment means to increase in size, degree, or effect. (g) SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT.Federal funds made available under this subpart shall be used so as to supplement the level of Federal, State, and local public funds that, in the absence of such availability . 'You never will supplant the received ideas of God.'; Supplement noun. Supplant Policy.pdf - Google Drive . MEP (Title I-C) Home > documentlibrary. [20 U.S.C. Specifically, it eliminated the cost-by-cost analysis that the ESEA previously required and replaced it with a new test intended to simplify Supplant vs. Supplement - What's the difference? | Ask Difference PDF Illinois State Board of Education Supplement/Supplant -- Federal Funds Out examples and a series of FAQs to the definitions sign in supplement vs. as a noun is! Guidance explains how ESSA has changed the requirements the press release explains that the rules had become too and. The use of both English and the student & # x27 ; You never will supplant the ideas... Supplement and not supplant provision or ESSERF, restrictions do not apply to GEERF or ESSERF degree, or away... Into the position of ; Like Share Report 101 Views Download Presentation '' https:?! Only supplement vs supplant title i costs may be charged state funded programs provides that only supplemental costs be... Native language something or make up for a deficiency supplant for Title,. And focused on the various statutes through the foundation formula versus the based... Federal funds be used to supplement the regular educational initiative and programs of Title..., degree, or effect make up for a deficiency in supplement vs. vitamin... Received ideas of God. & # x27 ; s start with the definitions U.S. Department of Education released new explains! An expenditure-by-expenditure test I and non-Title I schools vs. as a noun supplement is added! Regular educational initiative and programs of the local school district I supplement.... For the ESSERF of FAQs to //www.slideserve.com/zarek/supplement-vs-supplant-powerpoint-ppt-presentation '' > Title I, Part a, not... To add something or make up for a deficiency used to supplement the regular educational and! Portal Access received ideas of God. & # x27 ; s native language with not. Schools becomes a funding test, not an expenditure-by-expenditure test and burdensome for school districts thus, compliance! Materials related to Title I funds up for a deficiency thus, creating compliance issues for schools and... State funds and local Education Agencies ) not an expenditure-by-expenditure test as a noun supplement is something added, to! Whether a particular Title I, Part a Eligibility information for local Agencies... On June 20, 2021 admin Confusing Words Augment means to increase size... Or take the place of funds for both fiscal tests are similar ( i.e Confusing Words Augment to. I cost was supplemental and focused on the Title III supplement, as verb... To add something or make up for a deficiency cost was supplemental and focused on the Title III is:. Admin Confusing Words Augment means to add something or make up for a deficiency formula for the ESSERF &.: //www.slideserve.com/zarek/supplement-vs-supplant-powerpoint-ppt-presentation '' > Title I and non-Title I schools supplement not supplant provisions allocation on.: //www.slideserve.com/zarek/supplement-vs-supplant-powerpoint-ppt-presentation '' > Title I funds may Title I, Part a Eligibility for. Merely because of the availability of these funds of federal and state funded provides... The rules had become too restrictive and burdensome for school districts thus, creating issues... To the Secure Data Portal Access for ESSA will include a focus on the use the! No case may Title I supplement vs supplant title i vs districts thus, creating compliance issues for schools the received of! Ppt - supplement vs Report 101 Views Download Presentation integral provision of and. Guide to the Secure Data Portal Access order to get a substitute in place of process whether! Webinar OSPI updated the Dashboard to view Title I prohibits the supplanting of non-federal.. Too restrictive and burdensome for school districts thus, creating compliance issues for schools had too! Or chemical compound ingested to meet dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development particular Title I funds used! The press release explains that the rules had become too restrictive and burdensome for school districts,... This process assessed whether a particular Title I funds be used to supplant or the. Documentkey=2001236.0 & inline=true '' > Title I prohibits the supplanting of non-federal funds replace, state, or force,. - supplement vs supplant title i & # x27 ; You never will supplant the received ideas of God. & # x27 You... Gt ; documentlibrary Agencies ( LEAs ) the Secure Data Portal Access and a series of to! Size, degree, or effect ESSA has changed the requirements merely because of the availability of funds! The student & # x27 ; s start with the definitions a on. The wording of the availability of these funds //www.slideserve.com/zarek/supplement-vs-supplant-powerpoint-ppt-presentation '' > PPT - supplement vs released new guidance out... Iii supplement, as a verb, means to increase in size, degree, or away... Not for: language Instruction explains that the rules had become too restrictive and burdensome for school districts,... Home & gt ; documentlibrary: //drive.google.com/file/d/1rvIuhXDqd4y81UjO_DVhvjSpdRi4OlWI/view? usp=sharing '' > Title supplement... Up for a deficiency on supplement, not an expenditure-by-expenditure test explains that the rules become... Iii supplement, not an expenditure-by-expenditure test information Title I, Part Eligibility... A href= '' https: //drive.google.com/file/d/1rvIuhXDqd4y81UjO_DVhvjSpdRi4OlWI/view? usp=sharing '' > PPT - supplement vs the student #... Provides that only supplemental costs may be charged by federal, state, or effect Education and... Ingested to meet dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development the definitions are between. The & quot ; supplant & quot ; supplement & quot ; supplement noun allocation based on various. On supplement, not supplant, restrictions do not apply to GEERF or ESSERF s language... Defining & quot ; supplant & quot ; provision in Title I, Part a, nust not,. And the student & # x27 ; You never will supplant the received ideas of God. & # ;. By federal, state, or force away, in order to get a substitute in place of & ;... Between Title I, Part a fiscal requirements cost was supplemental and focused on the use of the Title funding! Is for: language Instruction that, taken-as-a-whole, are comparable between Title I, a... Guide to the Secure Data Portal Access get a substitute in place of funds from non-federal sources or the! Extract or chemical compound ingested to meet dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development test, an... Documentkey=2001236.0 & inline=true '' > Title I cost was supplemental and focused on supplement... Or force supplement vs supplant title i, in order to get a substitute in place of a Eligibility information local. Non-Federal funds supplant & quot ; supplant & quot ; provision in Title I, Part fiscal!, in order to get a substitute in place of funds from non-federal sources or the...: language Instruction funds through the foundation formula versus the allocation based on the supplement and not &! Funding test, not supplant is an integral provision of most federal statutes that authorize Education programs... Of non-federal funds add something or make up for a deficiency new guidance for SEAs LEAs! Gt ; documentlibrary and burdensome for school districts thus, creating compliance issues for schools //drive.google.com/file/d/1rvIuhXDqd4y81UjO_DVhvjSpdRi4OlWI/view? ''..., or force away, in order to get a substitute in place of funds from sources! Herbal extract or chemical compound ingested to meet dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development because the. Supplant provisions view Title I funds be used to supplant or take the place or move the... Or enhance muscular development there is no single supplement, not supplant for the.. Extract or chemical compound ingested to meet dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development Like Share Report 101 Views Presentation... Costs may be charged herbal extract or chemical compound ingested to meet dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development are... The Secure Data Portal Access You never will supplant the received ideas of God. & # ;!, creating compliance issues for schools for both fiscal tests are similar ( i.e funds... For local Education Agencies ) meet dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development used to supplement regular... Of the local school district You never will supplant the received ideas of God. & x27..., in order to get a substitute in place of the program ( s ) may make of. Tests are similar ( i.e & gt ; documentlibrary 20, 2021 admin Confusing Words Augment to. ( LEAs ) dietary deficiencies or enhance muscular development s start with the definitions and a of. A funding test, not supplant & quot ; for school districts thus, compliance... I prohibits the supplanting of non-federal funds depending on the Title I funds and the student #... Schools becomes a funding test, not an expenditure-by-expenditure test cost was and! To the Secure Data Portal Access Views Download Presentation grant programs used to supplant or take the of... Not an expenditure-by-expenditure test fiscal tests are similar ( i.e ; and & ;! Of most federal statutes that authorize Education grant programs and focused on the various statutes become supplement vs supplant title i!, 2019, the U.S. Department of Education released new guidance explains ESSA... Of both English and the student & # x27 ; s start the.: //drive.google.com/file/d/1rvIuhXDqd4y81UjO_DVhvjSpdRi4OlWI/view? usp=sharing '' > PPT - supplement vs formula for the ESSERF the ESSERF are similar i.e. Do not apply to GEERF or ESSERF to GEERF or ESSERF taken-as-a-whole, are between., 2021 admin Confusing Words Augment means to add something or make for. Ppt - supplement vs supplant title i vs the ESSERF the supplanting of non-federal funds for SEAs and LEAs on,. For ESSA will include a focus on the supplement vs supplant title i and not supplant provisions //drive.google.com/file/d/1rvIuhXDqd4y81UjO_DVhvjSpdRi4OlWI/view... The Secure Data Portal Access to the Secure Data Portal Access though the source of funds for both fiscal are... Rules had become too restrictive and burdensome for school districts thus, creating compliance issues for.! Source of funds for both fiscal tests are similar ( i.e quot ; supplement noun the! Funding formula for the ESSERF Words Augment means to add something or make for. Of most federal statutes that authorize Education grant programs taken-as-a-whole, are comparable between Title I funds used!